Prime Minister Alex Salmond proclaims that Scotland cannot reach its full economic potential unless it is independent. On the face of it, this seems like a pretty bold thing to say. However, before analysing the merits of this claim, is it purely a coincidence that this comes amid a 'revival' of Scottish culture?
Recently there has been an increased interest in Scottish culture and traditions. Whilst most people would cringe at the stereotypes of whisky, shortbread and haggis, it appears that descendants of immigrants to America and Canada feel a certain nostalgia for the icons of their ancestors' homeland. Even their new-found love for Scotland could support a drive for independence.
Economically, it seems as tall order to survive as a nation the size of Scotland. Having said that, if countries like Luxembourg and Andorra can survive then why shouldn't the Scots have a go?
On a sporting level, the Scots have always had independence. Any Scotland football fan worth his salt will gladly tell of victories over England at Wembley, perhaps most famously in 1967. Even in rugby, the Scots are fiercely proud of their sporting independence. In nearly every mainstream sport (with the exception of athletic/olympic sports) every home nation has independence from the union.
The minority SNP aims to devolve powers almost wholly to HolyRood with just matters of defence and foreign affairs still residing at Westminster. With various political commentators urging the Scots to drop the idea of a referendum on something so critical during this recession period, my bet is that they will do the exact opposite. With many disillusioned with the current Labour government, the advantage already lies with those who are pro-independence.
Scotland has long craved for a split from the UK. Who knows, in the current climate, they might just get their wish.
No comments:
Post a Comment